The Journal of Finance

The Journal of Finance publishes leading research across all the major fields of finance. It is one of the most widely cited journals in academic finance, and in all of economics. Each of the six issues per year reaches over 8,000 academics, finance professionals, libraries, and government and financial institutions around the world. The journal is the official publication of The American Finance Association, the premier academic organization devoted to the study and promotion of knowledge about financial economics.

AFA members can log in to view full-text articles below.

View past issues


Search the Journal of Finance:






Search results: 5.

On the Positive Role of Financial Intermediation in Allocation of Venture Capital in a Market with Imperfect Information

Published: 12/01/1983   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb03840.x

YUK‐SHEE CHAN

This paper develops a theory of financial intermediation that highlights the contribution of intermediaries as informed agents in a market with imperfect information. We consider a venture capital market where the entrepreneurs select the qualities of projects and their perquisite consumptions, about which the investors are imperfectly informed. It is shown that when all investors have positive search costs, the entrepreneurs are induced to offer the unacceptable inferior projects (“lemons” only), and the investors will not enter the venture capital market, but put their funds in other low return investments–an undesirable allocation of resources.


Information Production, Market Signalling, and the Theory of Financial Intermediation: A Comment

Published: 09/01/1982   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1982.tb03601.x

YUK‐SHEE CHAN


Depositors' Welfare, Deposit Insurance, and Deregulation

Published: 07/01/1985   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1985.tb05024.x

YUK‐SHEE CHAN, KING‐TIM MAK

We develop an analytical model to address the question of optimal deposit insurance policy and to examine the impact of deregulation on depositors' welfare and the soundness of the insurance system. We find that the optimal level of regulation depends critically on the functional relationship between risk and return. We show that in general deregulation of bank activities and/or of deposit rate ceilings will in volve tradeoff between depositors' welfare and the soundness of the insurance system. Our analysis also indicates that risk‐sensitive premium and capital requirement schedules may not be efficient in managing the risk of banks.


Collateral and Competitive Equilibria with Moral Hazard and Private Information

Published: 06/01/1987   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb02571.x

YUK‐SHEE CHAN, ANJAN V. THAKOR

The authors examine equilibrium credit contracts and allocations under different competitivity specifications and explain the economic roles of collateral under these specifications. Both moral hazard and adverse selection are considered. The principal message is that how a competitive equilibrium is conceptualized significantly affects the characterization of equilibrium credit contracts. Specifically, some well‐known results in the rationing literature are shown to rest delicately on the adopted equilibrium concept. Two somewhat surprising results emerge. First, high‐quality borrowers with unlimited collateral may be priced out of the market despite the bank having idle deposits. Second, high‐quality borrowers may put up more collateral.


Is Fairly Priced Deposit Insurance Possible?

Published: 03/01/1992   |   DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb03984.x

YUK‐SHEE CHAN, STUART I. GREENBAUM, ANJAN V. THAKOR

We analyze risk‐sensitive, incentive‐compatible deposit insurance in the presence of private information and moral hazard. Without deposit‐linked subsidies it is impossible to implement risk‐sensitive, incentive‐compatible deposit insurance pricing in a competitive, deregulated environment, except when the deposit insurer is the least risk averse agent in the economy. We establish this formally in the context of an insurance scheme in which privately informed depository institutions are offered deposit insurance premia contingent on reported capital; the result holds for alternative sorting instruments as well. This suggests a contradiction between deregulation and fairly priced, risk‐sensitive deposit insurance.