THE STRONG CASE FOR THE GENERALIZED LOGARITHMIC UTILITY MODEL AS THE PREMIER MODEL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS

THE STRONG CASE FOR THE GENERALIZED LOGARITHMIC UTILITY MODEL AS THE PREMIER MODEL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS

  • Robert Litzenberger
  • Mark Rubinstein

Article first published online: 30th April 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb01906.x

Abstract


This paper begins by comparing the available well‐developed micro‐economic models in finance which recognize uncertainty. It is argued that models whose distinctive simplifying assumption restricts utility functions are superior to those which instead restrict probability distributions, both with respect to the realism of their assumptions and richness of their conclusions. In particular, the most successful model, based on generalized logarithmic utility (GLUM), is a multiperiod consumption/portfolio and equilibrium model in discrete‐time which (1) requires decreasing absolute risk aversion; (2) tolerates increasing, constant, or decreasing proportional risk aversion; (3) assumes no exogenous specification of the contemporaneous or intertemporal stochastic process of security prices; (4) tolerates heterogeneity with respect to wealth, lifetime, time‐and risk‐preference and beliefs; (5) results in a complete specification of consumption/portfolio decision and sharing rules which include nontrivial multiperiod separation properties and explains demand for default‐free bonds of various maturities and options; (6) leads to a solution to the aggregation problem; (7) results in a complete specification of the contemporaneous and intertemporal process of security prices which reveals necessary and sufficient conditions for an unbiased term structure and the market portfolio to follow a random walk as a natural outcome of equilibrium; (8) provides an empirically testable aggregate consumption function relating per capita consumption to per capita wealth and the present value of a perpetual default‐free annuity which does not require inferences of ex ante beliefs from ex post data; (9) provides a nontrivial multiperiod extension of popular single‐period security valuation models which is empirically testable; (10) yields a simple multiperiod valuation formula for an uncertain income stream even when this income is serially correlated over time.

Sign in to access the full article.

Related articles


DISCUSSION

  • S. Sunder

Article first published online: 1st February 2016 / DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb00582.x

Read Article

DISCUSSION

  • J. Fred Weston
  • Edward M. Rice

Article first published online: 1st February 2016 / DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb00583.x

Read Article

DISCUSSION

  • Stavros B. Thomadakis
  • Donald R. Lessard

Article first published online: 1st February 2016 / DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb00584.x

Read Article

Back Matter

Article first published online: 1st February 2016 / DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb00585.x

Read Article

Front Matter

Article first published online: 1st February 2016 / DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb00575.x

Read Article

DISCUSSION

  • Sally S. Ronk

Article first published online: 1st February 2016 / DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb00576.x

Read Article

Are you an Author?


Please read our submission requirements and find out how to submit your paper to the Journal of Finance

Submit a paper